From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:09:09 -0500
Message-ID: <E1DCUKr-00055u-Kj@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87y8cx4b3e.fsf@jurta.org> <87hdj9s0yy.fsf@orebokech.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111201917 4542 80.91.229.2 (19 Mar 2005 03:11:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 03:11:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 19 04:11:57 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DCUNH-0003ih-RD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 04:11:39 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DCUbL-0001Is-LX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:26:11 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DCUau-0001El-Px
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:25:44 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DCUak-000173-F8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:25:34 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DCUak-00015l-4O
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:25:34 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DCUKs-000363-3Q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:09:10 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DCUKr-00055u-Kj; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:09:09 -0500
Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <87hdj9s0yy.fsf@orebokech.com> (message from Romain Francoise on
	Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:27:33 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34760
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34760

    Now that Richard has changed M-g to be a prefix key, can we implement
    this plan?

I would rather put this aside until after the release.
I would like a small group to organize to make a plan
for what to do with M-g, and discuss the question outside
of this list.  Would those who want to do this please do so?