From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: require-hard-newlines to use newline Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:16:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1483.220.255.172.231.1109730379.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> <200503020302.j2232fR21722@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <2750.220.255.172.231.1109734015.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> <1415.220.255.169.59.1109818150.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> <1404.220.255.169.59.1109889146.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> <200503040033.j240XD022473@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <50554.203.116.59.23.1109897782.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> <200503080005.j2805Kg28696@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <2451.220.255.169.59.1110299961.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> <2518.220.255.169.59.1110532203.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110667133 9009 80.91.229.2 (12 Mar 2005 22:38:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 12 23:38:52 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAFFv-00062d-Ct for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:38:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAFVH-0001ku-OK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DAFUN-0001MO-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:53:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DAFPN-0008HB-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAFPI-0008Bm-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DAEtu-0002tS-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DAEtt-0002xl-OP; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:16:01 -0500 Original-To: "Chong Yidong" In-reply-to: <2518.220.255.169.59.1110532203.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> (cyd@stupidchicken.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34525 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34525 The only way I can see for this to work is for the after-change function to test this-command, which I think is not very robust. I don't understand. Why check this-command? Wouldn't it be correct for longlines.el to operate on ALL text inserted in the buffer?