From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jari Aalto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line (To M-g M-g or not to M-g) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:07:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87y8cx4b3e.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110524839 2831 80.91.229.2 (11 Mar 2005 07:07:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 11 08:07:18 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9eEh-0003FV-6e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:07:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9eTi-0000bX-Gr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:22:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D9eSW-0000DH-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:21:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D9eSP-0000B4-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:21:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9eSI-0008RU-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [193.229.0.44] (helo=fep02-app.kolumbus.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D9eDh-0002dK-2r; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:06:01 -0500 Original-Received: from bongo.cante.net ([81.197.3.110]) by fep02-app.kolumbus.fi with ESMTP id <20050311070559.BKDE8756.fep02-app.kolumbus.fi@bongo.cante.net>; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:05:59 +0200 Original-Received: from mx2.cante.net ([192.168.1.3]:37533 helo=cante.cante.net) by bongo.cante.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1D9eDe-0005UG-20; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:05:58 +0200 Original-Received: from jaalto by cante.cante.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D9eEj-0005wb-Ph; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:07:06 +0200 Original-To: David Kastrup X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34459 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34459 | Jari Aalto writes: | | > | >David Kastrup writes: | > | > no previous desire, not fitting the feature | > | > freeze. Is this a plot to distract people from releasing? | > | | > | IMO, it is a reasonable opportunity to DTRT before locking M-g down as | > | a single command-key only. | > | > Juri made interesting suggestings, and I would see it beneficial if | > future be taken into consideration as well. | > | > M-g prefix sounds good for future additions. | > M-g M-g for goto-line sounds fast enough, because it's same key. | | Only if you have a Meta key. But doubling it up with M-g g would make | that a non-issue mostly. Indeed. Tt would be cubersome to use ESC + g ESC + g in TTY and defeat the fast access to the command. M-g g would be better Jari