From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:59:35 -0500
Message-ID: <E1D94X1-0006Bl-NC@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <fc339e4a05030715093f0987a1@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.3.96.1050308073303.661A-100000@acm.acm>
	<fc339e4a050308015760de2423@mail.gmail.com>
	<877jkijf2i.fsf@olgas.newt.com>
	<fc339e4a05030814152263af01@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110388144 23907 80.91.229.2 (9 Mar 2005 17:09:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:09:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: wohler@newt.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 18:09:04 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D94dk-0006hY-Gu
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:06:34 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D94sR-0001QG-Nf
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:21:43 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D94rV-0000ze-LA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:20:45 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D94rO-0000xF-Pj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:20:43 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D94rO-0000p0-0L
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:20:38 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D94X2-0000j4-5X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:59:36 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1D94X1-0006Bl-NC; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:59:35 -0500
Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <fc339e4a05030814152263af01@mail.gmail.com> (message from Miles
	Bader on Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:15:25 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34377
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34377

    I think David's suggestion of "as of" is good, though I think better
    as a simple replacement for "since" than at the front:

       FOO is an obsolete function (as of 21.4)

That looks good.