From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:29:21 -0500
Message-ID: <E1D6g5Z-0001R3-Sz@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <psyj0y9z.fsf@blue.sea.net>
	<200503020206.j2226Rj21690@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109817497 4179 80.91.229.2 (3 Mar 2005 02:38:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:38:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jari.aalto@cante.net
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 03:38:17 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D6gDm-0006tI-Uw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:37:51 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D6gWf-0002S1-Bk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:57:21 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D6gPb-0007HJ-VM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:50:04 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D6gPU-0007CL-6C
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:49:56 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6gPU-0007AQ-0w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:49:56 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D6g5a-0004SM-4a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:29:22 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1D6g5Z-0001R3-Sz; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:29:21 -0500
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200503020206.j2226Rj21690@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Tue, 1 Mar 2005 20:06:27 -0600 (CST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34120
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34120

      I believe that
    text/enriched should be updated for RFC 1896.  (Assuming that this is
    still the most up to date standard.  It was when I last checked.)
    Importantly, other formats should be supported.

I would very much appreciate that work.