From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: `texinfo-format-buffer' doesn't fold long lines
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:22:38 -0500
Message-ID: <E1D6Rw6-0004wy-M5@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <b9yis4dyre7.fsf@jpl.org> <E1D5spr-0005OA-Kj@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87bra49w0p.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109765387 16407 80.91.229.2 (2 Mar 2005 12:09:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:09:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: yamaoka@jpl.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 02 13:09:47 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D6Sff-0003gM-1h
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:09:43 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D6SyP-0006BJ-Ri
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:29:05 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D6SLt-0003ie-JR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:49:18 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D6SLq-0003hE-Pi
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:49:15 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6SLq-0003Rs-0O
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:49:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D6Rw7-00040a-I8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:22:39 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1D6Rw6-0004wy-M5; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:22:38 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87bra49w0p.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:09:57 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34058
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34058

    Should we move it lisp/obsolete?

Apparently it is still useful for something, so I guess not.
At least not now.