From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: follow-link in grep buffer Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:32:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <16922.19947.785134.975378@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <16926.51952.150749.303780@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <87bra8iyul.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109464380 12529 80.91.229.2 (27 Feb 2005 00:33:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 27 01:33:00 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D5CMP-00080e-A4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:32:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D5CdF-0003kB-O4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:50:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D5Ccg-0003Vp-M7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:49:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D5Cca-0003SL-Kg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:49:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D5CcZ-0003Po-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:49:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D5CMZ-0000di-1U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:32:47 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D5CMX-00029Z-QJ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:32:45 -0500 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:10:09 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33852 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33852 a) a double-click on a location that has no double-click binding, but a local mouse-2 binding, will execute the mouse-2 binding. This will make double-clicks, where not overriden, follow links without further code changes compared to 21.4 This means two different modes of operation where at present we have just one. A priori, that is undesirable. It would have to be quite clear that users would like this better and find it more natural. By the way, I see that double-mouse-1 does not work on clickable links. The reason seems to be that a long click followed immediately by a short one do not combine as a double click--regardless of the text. Is that correct behavior?