From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: follow-link in grep buffer
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:53:15 -0500
Message-ID: <E1D4oKh-0003Gt-2k@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <16922.19947.785134.975378@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<E1D3eVd-0000PW-9G@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<16926.51952.150749.303780@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<x5hdk17z15.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109373070 12777 80.91.229.2 (25 Feb 2005 23:11:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:11:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 26 00:11:09 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D4obw-0006vG-OO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:11:06 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D4otm-0007r0-UF
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:29:30 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D4onv-0004mk-Ui
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:23:28 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D4onl-0004jL-Uo
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:23:21 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D4oni-0004cC-WD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:23:15 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D4oKh-00053B-Ic
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:53:15 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1D4oKh-0003Gt-2k; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:53:15 -0500
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <x5hdk17z15.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:46:14 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33817
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33817

    In order not to confuse people too much, I really would want to
    suggest strongly that we remap double-click to mouse-2 unconditionally
    by default (where a "stronger" mouse-2 binding exists), and also map
    mouse-1 to the same when the special "link" property is present.

I do not see any sense in this proposal.  That idea for double-click
seems completely inconsistent with the overall scheme that we have
adopted.