From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: proofreading  man/dired.texi
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:27:50 -0500
Message-ID: <E1D16UI-0008U7-E2@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m31xbjtgh4.fsf@naru.home>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108490016 30434 80.91.229.6 (15 Feb 2005 17:53:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:53:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 15 18:53:30 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1D16t5-0005H3-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:53:30 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D178f-0004ak-R4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:09:33 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D16wD-00007C-Jb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:56:41 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D16wC-00006p-Ik
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:56:40 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D16uP-0007qc-AX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:54:49 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D16YR-0001Et-4t
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:32:07 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1D16UI-0008U7-E2; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:27:50 -0500
Original-To: Joakim Verona <joakim@verona.se>
In-reply-to: <m31xbjtgh4.fsf@naru.home> (message from Joakim Verona on Mon, 14
	Feb 2005 14:32:07 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33488
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33488

    I have attempted to proofread man/dired.texi.

    L22: dired-x is mentioned. I think "wdired" should be mentioned as
    well.

    L16: Not consistent with the "wdired" minor mode, in which characters
    do insert.

If wdired is inconsistent with dired, I would rather change wdired.
It is less well known and less often used.

Why does wdired allow self-insertion?
Is there a good reason for it?
If not, it would seem to be a bug.