From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ralf Angeli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tooltips on w32 slow and strange Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:56:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <016b01c51163$45e1d630$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <16186.217.194.34.123.1108368907.squirrel@wwws.franken.de> <4210762C.9030203@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108404881 20721 80.91.229.2 (14 Feb 2005 18:14:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 14 19:14:40 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0kjl-0002rF-5M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:14:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0kzL-0005xA-Aq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:30:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0ktp-0002k9-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:24:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0ktb-0002eH-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:24:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0kta-0002TF-UM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:24:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [134.96.7.25] (helo=triton.rz.uni-saarland.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0kSW-0003zL-GY; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:56:32 -0500 Original-Received: from iwi-gate.iwi.uni-sb.de (iwi-gate.iwi.uni-sb.de [134.96.72.13]) by triton.rz.uni-saarland.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1EHuTPs2856778; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:56:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [134.96.72.190] (helo=neutrino.iwi.uni-sb.de) by iwi-gate.iwi.uni-sb.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1D0kSG-000O1O-J0; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:56:16 +0100 Original-Received: from angeli by neutrino.iwi.uni-sb.de with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D0kSG-0001Rr-GN; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:56:16 +0100 Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:16:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-IWi-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-IWi-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IWi-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 5, autolearn=disabled) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.1 (triton.rz.uni-saarland.de [134.96.7.25]); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:56:29 +0100 (CET) X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.6; AVE 6.29.0.11; VDF 6.29.0.124 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33404 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33404 * David Kastrup (2005-02-14) writes: > Ralf Angeli writes: > >> I just saw those tooltips the first time in my life by enabling >> tooltip-mode and hovering with the mouse pointer over some menus >> generated by AUCTeX. If one is used to native GTK tooltips, the ones >> generated by Emacs look really awkward. > > Uh what? Tooltips are enabled by default. At least I get them also > with -q -no-site-file. The customization buffer says, however, [...] > How comes that your Emacs behaves differently than mine? Have you > explicitly disabled tooltips, or am I just being crazy in some manner > again? It seems that I disabled them a long time ago: tooltip-mode: Hide Value Toggle off (nil) State: this option has been set and saved. At least I cannot remember turning off the mode. Maybe I repressed that because I found them so ugly and disturbing. (c; -- Ralf