From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Coding system conversion error Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:37:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20050205170221.ZTBD24781.mxfep02.bredband.com@coolsville.localdomain> <738f9db09f1986269b8f5719d45d2dd5@swipnet.se> <4207DAF0.6000204@swipnet.se> <4209342E.5010701@swipnet.se> <165be0ad579be34852d18cc600114175@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108197615 30636 80.91.229.2 (12 Feb 2005 08:40:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 12 09:40:14 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Czsow-0006Fs-08 for gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:40:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Czt40-0001NV-Ll for gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:55:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Czt3P-0001M8-C7 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:55:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Czt3J-0001L5-RX for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:54:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Czt3J-0001Kt-AI; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:54:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Czsq1-0002yK-4h; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:41:13 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CzsmF-00032U-A4; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:37:19 -0500 Original-To: "Jan D." In-reply-to: <165be0ad579be34852d18cc600114175@swipnet.se> (jan.h.d@swipnet.se) X-BeenThere: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: emacs-pretest-bug.gnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:5837 gmane.emacs.devel:33277 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33277 > Normally, the caller would instead use `STRING_SET_UNIBYTE' after the > call > (or rather calls one of make_foo_string which does it for him) if > needed. This is not the same as what I suggested, but this too is ok. However, if we stick with this, we should document it better in the comments before allocate_string_data.