From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: New undo element (fun . args)
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 06:47:06 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CyTpi-0000B4-At@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3hdkzn3p5.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<fc339e4a05012917243b021893@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fz0jyn19.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1CvaFP-0002xI-Rj@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3sm4hbvlg.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<E1CwEvx-0004KY-Gv@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87mzunvyki.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<m3brb3nf5a.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<E1CwmPw-00035j-MS@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3sm4cuyd2.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> <m3ekfsk2qg.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<x58y608slc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107864677 5213 80.91.229.2 (8 Feb 2005 12:11:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:11:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 08 13:11:16 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CyUCr-0006cw-RM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:11:02 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CyURB-0001hp-N8
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:25:49 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CyUOZ-0000FF-LU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:23:07 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CyUOU-0000Cz-4s
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:23:02 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyUOP-00009h-6s
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:22:57 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyTt5-0006wP-2i
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 06:50:35 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CyTpi-0000B4-At; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 06:47:06 -0500
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <x58y608slc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:25:35 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33073
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33073

    Since we are likely to break redo.el, wouldn't it be sensible to
    provide the functionality from within Emacs once and for all?

That might be a good idea--but it depends on what the specific
functionality is, and what part of it is already supported by
the existing options.