From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Eliminating "changed in Emacs outside of Customize"
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:27:59 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CxIUB-0006kl-SW@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <FDELKNEBLPKKDCEBEJCBAEJDCLAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<E1Cwaeh-0007ed-Ai@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<00eb01c509c2$1a870990$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107582371 23115 80.91.229.2 (5 Feb 2005 05:46:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 05:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, abraham@dina.kvl.dk,
	drew.adams@oracle.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 05 06:46:10 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CxIlg-0003Zh-KD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 06:46:04 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CxIzL-0001Xv-Tm
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:00:11 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CxIxk-0000d4-VM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:58:33 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CxIxd-0000a6-Ce
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:58:25 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CxIxc-0000Xb-KL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:58:24 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CxIXC-0008I6-CT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:31:06 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CxIUB-0006kl-SW; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:28:00 -0500
Original-To: "Lennart Borgman" <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <00eb01c509c2$1a870990$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488>
	(lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32899
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32899

    > That seems correct to me.  In particular, it means you can edit the
    > defcustom and eval the edited one, and the edit takes effect.

    Does not defface works differently in this respect?

I don't know--does it?