From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Eliminating "changed in Emacs outside of Customize"
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:12:47 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CwmPH-0002uC-FB@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <FDELKNEBLPKKDCEBEJCBKEINCLAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<87lla8xdps.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<rjpszjqtq4.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107458224 10895 80.91.229.6 (3 Feb 2005 19:17:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:17:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 03 20:16:56 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CwmTI-0003Bq-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:16:56 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Cwmgf-0005hO-R1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:30:45 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CwmgF-0005fX-LA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:30:19 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CwmgE-0005f5-4W
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:30:18 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CwmgE-0005f1-0u
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:30:18 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwmS8-0004IE-9x
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:15:44 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CwmPH-0002uC-FB; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:12:47 -0500
Original-To: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
In-reply-to: <rjpszjqtq4.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk> (message from Per
	Abrahamsen on Wed, 02 Feb 2005 08:57:55 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32824
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32824

    The "Changed outside customize" has been a great help for me to catch
    those hooks, setq's and poorly written major modes, and I think Emacs
    has improved because of it, by fixing the modes and rethinking the
    hooks.

We could provide an option to continue making the distinction,
for the sake of testing.