From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: New undo element (fun . args)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:01:39 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CvaFP-0002xI-Rj@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3hdkzn3p5.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<fc339e4a05012917243b021893@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fz0jyn19.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107173234 12449 80.91.229.6 (31 Jan 2005 12:07:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:07:14 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 31 13:07:06 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CvaKg-0000Dh-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:07:06 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CvaXO-0007v7-4r
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:20:14 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CvaWV-0007cB-6C
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:19:19 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CvaWT-0007b6-F3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:19:17 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CvaWS-0007a4-NE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:19:16 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CvaHv-000219-AA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:04:15 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CvaFP-0002xI-Rj; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:01:40 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87fz0jyn19.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:07:22 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32665
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32665

    100% agreement.  I even suggest we pass the BEG and END args to FUN.
    I.e. basically keep the current setup, except require the first 2 args to be
    BEG and END.

That would be a nuisance; you would be unable to use existing functions
for this purpose.

By the way, note that we would have to change SES to handle the new
format, if we change the format.