From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: What lookup-key returns for an undefined key
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:43:11 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CqgWd-0000pg-2k@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <01c4fb00$Blat.v2.2.2$c89387a0@zahav.net.il>
	<200501151718.j0FHISK05626@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<01c4fb85$Blat.v2.2.2$cdd188e0@zahav.net.il>
	<E1CqMJV-0008Ix-GD@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200501170322.j0H3MNk10808@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1106005805 5172 80.91.229.6 (17 Jan 2005 23:50:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:50:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 18 00:49:58 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CqgdC-0003gt-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:49:58 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Cqgp4-00039i-Bc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:02:14 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CqgmQ-0002fy-5X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:59:31 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CqgmE-0002Yc-T6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:59:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqgmE-0002Xi-MF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:59:18 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CqgXh-0008C1-1K
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:44:17 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CqgWd-0000pg-2k; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:43:11 -0500
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200501170322.j0H3MNk10808@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:22:23 -0600 (CST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32305
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32305

    Is the following OK?  Should this count as an "incompatible" change?

It is ok.  I think it should count as incompatible, since the only
reason to mention it in NEWS is that it might break some things.