From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: What lookup-key returns for an undefined key
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:08:17 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CqMJV-0008Ix-GD@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <01c4fb00$Blat.v2.2.2$c89387a0@zahav.net.il>
	<200501151718.j0FHISK05626@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<01c4fb85$Blat.v2.2.2$cdd188e0@zahav.net.il>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1105928136 23067 80.91.229.6 (17 Jan 2005 02:15:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:15:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 03:15:29 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CqMQT-0002t8-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 03:15:29 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CqMcI-0002Ma-CN
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:27:42 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CqMbn-0002Fm-Ex
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:27:12 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CqMbU-00027q-CP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:26:52 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqMbT-00024l-AW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:26:51 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CqMKT-000698-3r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:09:17 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CqMJV-0008Ix-GD; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:08:17 -0500
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <01c4fb85$Blat.v2.2.2$cdd188e0@zahav.net.il> (eliz@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32278
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32278

    In any case, I think that the change to dired-mode-map should be in
    NEWS.

This is an implementation detail.  In general, programs that depend on
the internal behavior of various parts of Emacs may break when we
change those internals.  I don't want NEWS to describe internal
changes merely because of this; it would distract people from more
important changes by burying them in lots of minor ones.

However, the change in suppress-keymap ought to be in NEWS.