From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: push and pop
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:27:15 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Co68B-0000Fg-Ok@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <pan.2005.01.07.18.21.53.124866@as.arizona.edu>
	<jwvk6qphtxd.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<1105132512.26051.75.camel@turtle.as.arizona.edu>
	<E1CnIbV-0006XW-2r@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<1105293235.16765.10.camel@slider>
	<200501091942.j09Jglp17173@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<x57jmm9y10.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1105389088 5930 80.91.229.6 (10 Jan 2005 20:31:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:31:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	jdsmith@as.arizona.edu
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 10 21:31:08 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Co6Bw-0000LK-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:31:08 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Co6NS-0007Fu-1i
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:43:02 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Co6MF-0006v5-HV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:41:49 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Co6M9-0006rL-BI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:41:41 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Co6M9-0006nk-1c
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:41:41 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Co68d-0007uv-0f
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:27:43 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Co68B-0000Fg-Ok; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:27:23 -0500
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <x57jmm9y10.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:56:43 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32105
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32105

    My guess as well.  So the question would be whether it would desirable
    if Elisp were to get setf as a standard macro.

I don't want to make such a big extension to Emacs Lisp in that way.