From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Getting more info on a variable in Customize buffers
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:56:16 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Cmdk0-0006iT-2k@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBCEKGCIAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<jwvk6quctxs.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<rjbrc5v95o.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk>
	<m18y79qois.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1ClulT-0004f2-Vm@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<871xd1kk9t.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1CmHRk-0004eb-Km@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvllb77ho9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1105041954 1373 80.91.229.6 (6 Jan 2005 20:05:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 06 21:05:45 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CmdtA-00088a-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:05:44 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cme4U-0007ud-85
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:17:26 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cme2n-0006wy-Tt
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:15:42 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cme2m-0006ut-2g
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:15:40 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cme2l-0006uD-RM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:15:39 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cmdqh-0002wc-K6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:03:11 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Cmdk0-0006iT-2k; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:56:16 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwvllb77ho9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:25:42 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31969
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31969

    You seem to consider the cost of introducing a macro `defkeymap' to be
    enormous (large enough that it needs very significant benefits to justify
    itself).

No, I said that you could argue for it as an abbreviation.