From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: No "From so-and-so" in ChangeLog
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:36:26 -0500
Message-ID: <E1ClfUg-0007e8-4M@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1ClJsv-0001TZ-SS@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwv3bxics8u.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104810454 4289 80.91.229.6 (4 Jan 2005 03:47:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 03:47:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 04 04:47:25 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ClffJ-0004hA-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:47:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1ClfqU-0002w4-BJ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:58:58 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Clfoi-0001Q2-SN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:57:08 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Clfof-0001Oc-M8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:57:05 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Clfof-0001N4-HD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:57:05 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Clfaw-0005KM-30
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:42:54 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ClfUg-0007e8-4M; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:36:26 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwv3bxics8u.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:56:25 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31790
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31790

    Shouldn't we then change changelog-mode's font-lock rules?

I don't know what rules it uses--maybe so.