From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: revert-buffer and changes in encoding
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:24:42 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Ckbko-0003OB-TM@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1Cgi5j-0007hF-AI@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200412301244.VAA28792@etlken.m17n.org>
	<E1Ck7Nu-0006kl-7y@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200412302352.IAA00037@etlken.m17n.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104557598 3158 80.91.229.6 (1 Jan 2005 05:33:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 05:33:18 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 06:33:12 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ckbt1-0002Nc-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 06:33:12 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Ckc44-0007nt-6I
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:44:36 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Ckc2q-0007Bz-5I
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:43:20 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Ckc2n-00079z-9D
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:43:18 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ckc2m-000799-8s
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:43:16 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ckbql-000353-Jq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:30:51 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Ckbko-0003OB-TM; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:24:43 -0500
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <200412302352.IAA00037@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi
	Handa on Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:52:40 +0900 (JST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31654
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31654

    > Is that right?  Wouldn't that get automatically-chosen coding systems
    > as well as explicit user-specified coding systems?

    Yes.  But, whatever coding system is used for writing a
    file, revert-buffer should read the file with the same
    coding system.

That seems like a good argument.