From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-trunk-diffs] Changes to emacs/lisp/faces.el Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:57:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87mzwsws3d.fsf@jurta.org> <41B6317B.6020303@esperanto.org> <41BC0D29.9020007@t-online.de> <87sm5wfhh3.fsf@jurta.org> <87ekhcsurb.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ebea$Blat.v2.2.2$4d937300@zahav.net.il> <87r7lbikl4.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ec5f$Blat.v2.2.2$d17a06a0@zahav.net.il> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104210463 30592 80.91.229.6 (28 Dec 2004 05:07:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 05:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 06:07:37 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cj9a4-0002aP-00 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 06:07:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj9kt-0008Qs-Sk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:18:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj9hc-0006dF-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:15:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj9hX-0006aN-L4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:15:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj9hX-0006ZW-5b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:15:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cj9Vt-0007O4-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:17 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cj9QL-0004qO-CV; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:57:33 -0500 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <01c4ec5f$Blat.v2.2.2$d17a06a0@zahav.net.il> (eliz@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31519 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31519 I'm not sure that was a good idea, since comments normally have a face that makes them stand out. I thought that several people complained about ^L being too glaring. Yes, we do not want this font to call too much attention to itself. It should be just different enough from the usual color that you can easily tell the difference.