From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [patch] mode-line faces on 256-color terminals
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:33:41 -0500
Message-ID: <E1ChqVh-0006fT-IS@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200412222308.iBMN8rBT002077@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>
	<E1ChYh2-0007ML-R7@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200412231946.iBNJkwBT029307@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103899306 16974 80.91.229.6 (24 Dec 2004 14:41:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 14:41:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 24 15:41:41 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ChqdR-0006CU-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:41:41 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Chqo5-0007xT-Q0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:52:41 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Chqnb-0007wU-Bn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:52:11 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Chqna-0007vR-9e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:52:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ChqnZ-0007ul-RW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:52:09 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Chqap-0003aC-Uw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:39:00 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ChqVh-0006fT-IS; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:33:41 -0500
Original-To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
In-reply-to: <200412231946.iBNJkwBT029307@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> (message from
	Dan Nicolaescu on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:46:55 -0800)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31371
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31371

      > Could you wait a week for the people who know the most about
      > face issues to comment?  If there has been no criticism in a week,
      > please install it, or else ask me to install it.

    Oops, I have already installed it based on Eli's OK.
    What should I do, should I revert the patch now? 

I think he is one of the people who ought to know.
Since he thinks it is ok, probably it is.
So you may as well leave it installed now.