From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: `inhibit-mark-movement'
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 05:56:41 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CgLDV-0001EM-D5@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200412080256.30114.pogonyshev@gmx.net>
	<871xe1trnq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<200412081740.48280.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <871xe0y8lg.fsf@jurta.org>
	<jwvfz2g38co.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <871xdosy4l.fsf@jurta.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103541086 14010 80.91.229.6 (20 Dec 2004 11:11:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:11:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 20 12:11:18 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CgLRd-0005hs-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:11:18 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CgLc4-0003hf-HU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:22:04 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CgLTY-0002J0-Fn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:13:17 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CgLTT-0002Hk-OU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:13:12 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CgLTT-0002Gx-49
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:13:11 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CgLID-00057n-EC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:01:33 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CgLDV-0001EM-D5; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 05:56:41 -0500
Original-To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
In-reply-to: <871xdosy4l.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Fri, 17
	Dec 2004 18:11:38 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31289
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31289

      I propose the following fix for `pop-mark'
    which deactivates the active mark regardless of the state of the
    mark ring:

It seems right to me.  Thanks.