From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: Re: Permission to use portions of the recent GNU Emacs Manual Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:53:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87llc49kn1.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20041212125027.024c6900@mail.comcast.net> <87d5xbd4it.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103245162 11565 80.91.229.6 (17 Dec 2004 00:59:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, stephen@xemacs.org, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org, andy@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 17 01:59:14 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cf6Sf-0001Ir-00 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 01:59:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cf6cw-0006Oi-G9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:09:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cf6cm-0006MT-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:09:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cf6cl-0006LR-0u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:09:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cf6ck-0006LJ-Rz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:09:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cf6Rg-00072K-TM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:58:12 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cf6NL-00033d-Fr; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:53:43 -0500 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:58:12 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31221 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:17484 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31221 The people who consider these issues for Debian have arrived at an extremely strict and mechanical way of interpreting their criteria, which I think is very mistaken. The FSF made this decision years ago, and it is not an open question now. Could you please move the discussion to gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org?