From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: while-no-input
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 13:51:25 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CY7fJ-0005L4-FB@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <1B3ACCFD5694A94DBA4E231402B0E9ED9DD6C2@mucmail1.sdm.de>
	<m3d5y0kf66.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101581669 14876 80.91.229.6 (27 Nov 2004 18:54:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:54:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, klaus.berndl@sdm.de
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 27 19:54:25 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CY7iD-0005b8-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:54:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CY7rW-0007JW-P8
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 14:04:02 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CY7rK-0007GY-AF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 14:03:50 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CY7rJ-0007G3-Ax
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 14:03:49 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CY7rJ-0007Fr-4o
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 14:03:49 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CY7ha-0006XT-6O
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 13:53:46 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CY7fJ-0005L4-FB; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 13:51:25 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3d5y0kf66.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30436
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30436

    Current state is that RMS rejected Stefan's implementation of while-no-input.

    No further progress was made, as Stefan didn't want to pursue the
    issue further and I didn't quite understand how RMS wanted to
    implement it using a signal.

I don't remember the discussion, but if you tell me what month it was,
I can search for the messages.