From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improvements to `(emacs)File Variables' Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:25:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878y942l8h.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <20041114232600.GA12968@fencepost> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100831294 2932 80.91.229.6 (19 Nov 2004 02:28:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 02:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, overlord@gmx.li, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 19 03:28:06 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUyVJ-0005GO-00 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:28:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUyeB-0004Yz-M7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:37:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUydg-0004He-5M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:36:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUydd-0004Fj-OP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUydd-0004Fg-Lw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUyU6-00075u-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:26:50 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CUySl-0004AV-46; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:25:27 -0500 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:47:31 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30059 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30059 Let's not forget that the original question in this thread is whether we should *add* more documentation for the "unibyte:t" cookie. I think we can answer "no" without formally declaring the feature obsolete (after all, it is already documented at other places, so we don't need to advertise it further). I agree, on that question.