From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: printing.el again
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:03:56 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CUHz2-0001RC-BB@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m14qjtx9fm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <419779C4.50909@ig.com.br>
	<871xew44v1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <41990B75.1080603@ig.com.br>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100667988 11061 80.91.229.6 (17 Nov 2004 05:06:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 06:06:19 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CUI1K-0000HJ-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:06:19 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CUIA7-0002Py-Bs
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:15:23 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CUI9B-00022g-Mc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:14:25 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CUI9A-00021R-4Y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:14:24 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUI99-00021K-Uo
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:14:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUI0A-0007jd-VT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:05:07 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CUHz2-0001RC-BB; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:03:56 -0500
Original-To: Vinicius Jose Latorre <viniciusjl@ig.com.br>
In-reply-to: <41990B75.1080603@ig.com.br> (message from Vinicius Jose Latorre
	on Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:03:01 -0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29959
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29959

     > Yes, that's another solution.  I find CL's `flet' much more elegant, tho.

It is ok to use the CL macros in general, but the use of flet on a
function that is not internal to your package is really un-cool.

Using flet on a function name internal to your package is ok, but I
think that if you have a value that varies, it is better to use a
variable name for it.