From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: alarm_signal_handler is called too frequently Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:22:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <7E7ABFB6-2693-11D9-9BC4-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> <41813425.2010001@swipnet.se> <4181EA7E.2020309@swipnet.se> <4185FC85.70100@swipnet.se> <41880288.2070706@swipnet.se> <9AF2796A-2EB2-11D9-A7C3-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1099718754 13489 80.91.229.6 (6 Nov 2004 05:25:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 05:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 06 06:25:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CQJ5B-0000NB-00 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 06:25:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQJDQ-0006LW-5A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:34:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CQJCP-0005Ws-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:33:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CQJCO-0005Vz-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:33:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQJCN-0005VK-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:33:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CQJ3n-0006nN-AK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CQJ29-0004Ta-4K; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:22:41 -0500 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29469 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29469 Why is it unsafe to Feval with input blocked? I thought that this was not handled at all, and wouldn't have a chance of working right. But I can't find a reason now why it won't work.