From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: alarm_signal_handler is called too frequently Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:42:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <7E7ABFB6-2693-11D9-9BC4-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> <41813425.2010001@swipnet.se> <4181EA7E.2020309@swipnet.se> <4185FC85.70100@swipnet.se> <41880288.2070706@swipnet.se> <745212A0-2DBD-11D9-88B2-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1099601097 30658 80.91.229.6 (4 Nov 2004 20:44:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 04 21:44:48 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CPoTP-0004SU-00 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:44:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CPobZ-00047T-1r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:53:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CPobN-00047H-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:53:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CPobN-00046o-3B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:53:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CPobM-00046l-WD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:53:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CPoT6-0005MQ-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:44:28 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CPoRb-00040A-KO; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:42:55 -0500 Original-To: "Jan D." In-reply-to: <745212A0-2DBD-11D9-88B2-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> (jan.h.d@swipnet.se) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29439 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29439 > Are you thinking of the menu bar? I think this code is concerned only > with popup menus; they are invoked with x-popup-menu, which is > analogous to x-popup-dialog. So it has nothing to do with KeyPress. Duh, I meant ButtonPress. Anyway, both popup menus and dialogs are equal in this regard. Yes, but I think neither of them is invoked with ButtonPress. They are called by Lisp and from read_char_x_menu_prompt.