From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: compilation-mode makes the buffer read-only
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:45:02 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CPKVa-0000va-EI@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m1u0sajyax.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1COuPt-00017v-L9@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1d5ywh2zt.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1099486147 26715 80.91.229.6 (3 Nov 2004 12:49:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:49:07 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: occitan@esperanto.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 03 13:49:01 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CPKZR-0000C2-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 13:49:01 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CPKhX-0008Si-GH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:57:23 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CPKgF-00087H-Kp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:56:03 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CPKgD-00085t-TY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:56:02 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CPKgD-00085e-BD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:56:01 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CPKWw-0001qg-Oo
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:46:26 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CPKVa-0000va-EI; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:45:02 -0500
Original-To: Stefan <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <m1d5ywh2zt.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan on
	Tue, 02 Nov 2004 07:11:00 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29378
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29378

     my change intended to further reduce the number of cases
    where the buffer is made read-only by moving it to `compilation-start'.

Would you please be more specific?  Can you tell us one or more
specific cases where currently this makes the buffer read-only but you
think it should not?