From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: gnus/html2text.el
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:35:41 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CMri1-0002lQ-A0@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200410250246.i9P2kku06530@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1CMNFn-0002t9-Sx@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvzn29juyx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<m3oeipun6c.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<87acu9osia.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098898642 17225 80.91.229.6 (27 Oct 2004 17:37:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:37:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 27 19:37:17 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CMrjZ-0005dc-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:37:17 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CMrrK-00087W-8z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:45:18 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CMrqU-0007sK-0q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:44:26 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CMrqS-0007rB-2B
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:44:24 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMrqR-0007qy-Qh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:44:23 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CMrie-0001Gz-Ls
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:36:20 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CMri1-0002lQ-A0; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:35:41 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87acu9osia.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:35:28 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29069
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29069

      Specificity becomes
    relevant in cases like:

       (with-no-warnings (ent-of-buffer))

    which will not give you the warning you'd want to get.
    Maybe `with-no-warnings' should take an extra argument listing the kind of
    warning to ignore.

Theoretically this is an issue, but in practice it's not a big
enough problem to be worth adding that feature.  Please let's let
this drop.