From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus/html2text.el Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:04:31 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200410250246.i9P2kku06530@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098781655 1109 80.91.229.6 (26 Oct 2004 09:07:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 11:07:30 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CMNIc-0001Hq-00 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:07:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMNQJ-0001DL-5P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:15:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMNOR-0000xN-C8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:13:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMNON-0000vv-SR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMNOM-0000vj-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:13:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CMNGH-0003g9-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CMNFn-0002t9-Sx; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:04:31 -0400 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200410250246.i9P2kku06530@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:46:46 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28962 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28962 Unfortunately, after grepping around a little bit, it would at first view seem that such abuse of {beginning,end}-of-buffer and other mark setting commands is even substantially more widespread than the kind of abuses of `interactive-p' we have been looking at. Perhaps we should arrange for byte-compile to warn about use of these functions from Lisp code. What do people think of that? Aside from beginning-of-buffer and end-of-buffer, what functions are you talking about?