From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:07:30 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CJDZC-00031f-IK@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87pt3m5vqk.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family>
	<E1CIFvM-0006Nf-U4@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1r7o0b0vy.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1CIoyS-0002xV-7v@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87zn2mh5jk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098029301 8929 80.91.229.6 (17 Oct 2004 16:08:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 16:08:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 17 18:08:16 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CJDZv-0005Dw-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:08:15 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CJDhA-0007gI-2a
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:15:44 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CJDgu-0007aO-72
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:15:28 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CJDgt-0007Zs-9Y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:15:27 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJDgt-0007Zh-5E
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:15:27 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CJDZD-00040v-HM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:07:31 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CJDZC-00031f-IK; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:07:31 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87zn2mh5jk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:41:58 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28513
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28513

    I doubt anybody used interactive-p rather than an extra argument just
    because of the subtle difference w.r.t keyboard macros.  I expect 99% of the
    people who used interactive-p haven't even thought about the interaction
    with keyboard macros.

I agree with you, but I think we should check the existing calls
to make sure that we're not breaking some while we fix others.