From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.lisp.gcl.devel
Subject: Re: unexec development
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:52:13 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CIoyj-0002zp-7u@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <54ekkafszc.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com>
	<54ekk0xebm.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097934976 4416 80.91.229.6 (16 Oct 2004 13:56:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: gcl-devel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 16 15:56:12 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CIp2Z-0006qt-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:56:12 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CIp9l-0000KP-Qc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:03:37 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CIp6q-00072d-U8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:00:37 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CIp6o-00071B-HT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:00:34 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CIp6n-0006xo-5K; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:00:33 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CIoyk-0006Ko-68; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:52:14 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CIoyj-0002zp-7u; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:52:13 -0400
Original-To: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
In-reply-to: <54ekk0xebm.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> (message from Camm Maguire
	on 15 Oct 2004 10:10:05 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28483 gmane.lisp.gcl.devel:4719
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28483

We're not doing any work to extend unexec for Emacs's sake.
However, it would not be objectionable to extend it for GCL's sake.