From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: alarm_signal_handler is called too frequently
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:43:24 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CHkLc-0006oa-Mt@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <wlhdoz4dva.wl@church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097678687 4691 80.91.229.6 (13 Oct 2004 14:44:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:44:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 13 16:44:40 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CHkMq-00089T-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:44:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CHkTs-0000k1-KX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:51:56 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CHkTP-0000as-Ns
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:51:27 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CHkTP-0000aY-4G
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:51:27 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHkTP-0000aO-1n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:51:27 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CHkLd-0001OV-CX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:43:25 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CHkLc-0006oa-Mt; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:43:24 -0400
Original-To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
In-reply-to: <wlhdoz4dva.wl@church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> (message from
	YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu on Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:15:53 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28354
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28354

    If BLOCK_INPUT continues for a long time, which is typical
    in Mac OS X/Carbon,

That sounds like a bug to me.  BLOCK_INPUT should only be set
for short periods of time.