From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:42:24 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1096006177.432792.29828.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <1096014084.739640.30529.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <200410031040.i93Ae1YS000609@oak.pohoyda.family> <87d5zvwmq9.fsf_-_@oak.pohoyda.family> <87r7o8yf4g.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <878yaeuo8x.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <87acutulj0.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <87ekk3vrtn.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097678603 4422 80.91.229.6 (13 Oct 2004 14:43:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 13 16:43:06 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CHkLK-0007ww-00 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:43:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHkSM-0008Aw-7C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:50:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHkS0-00086r-Qs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:50:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHkRy-00085B-PK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHkRy-00084S-G2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CHkKs-000116-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CHkKe-0006hE-5E; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:42:26 -0400 Original-To: Alexander Pohoyda In-reply-to: <87ekk3vrtn.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> (message from Alexander Pohoyda on 12 Oct 2004 18:12:20 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28351 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28351 > You're right, that sounds suboptimal. However, I'm afraid that Gnus > people will not like the idea of adapting Gnus to a new code and I > don't want to force them to do this. > > Sorry, what does this refer to? Force them to do what? Force Gnus developers to adapt Gnus to a new MIME library. It would be easy to replace the old files with a compatible interface to the new code. Or just give the new code the same interface. Then they would not need to change anything in Gnus.