From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:45:47 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1096006177.432792.29828.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <1096014084.739640.30529.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <200410031040.i93Ae1YS000609@oak.pohoyda.family> <87d5zvwmq9.fsf_-_@oak.pohoyda.family> <87r7o8yf4g.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <878yaeuo8x.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097513230 16965 80.91.229.6 (11 Oct 2004 16:47:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 11 18:46:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CH3K3-0007VB-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:46:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CH3R0-0004GV-Dz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CH3QU-00046E-PK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:53:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CH3QQ-00044J-OB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CH3QQ-00041r-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:53:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CH3Iy-0006Ly-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:45:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CH3Ix-0000ts-Rn; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:45:47 -0400 Original-To: Alexander Pohoyda In-reply-to: <878yaeuo8x.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> (message from Alexander Pohoyda on 11 Oct 2004 01:50:22 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28238 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28238 Meanwhile, I have re-implemented about 20 rfc* functions because I didn't like their dependency on mm-* code. My implementation is also cleaner in a way that it uses even more basic general-purpose mail functions which I will try to put into mail-utils.el file. I like the idea of doing it this way. How many lines do they add up to? Let's decide whether this should be one file or many. What I'm going to do now is to remove mm-* dependency from lisp/gnus/rfc*.el files and submit a patch here. I cannot follow this part. If we are replacing and eliminating the code in lisp/gnus/rfc*.el, why talk about patching those files?