From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [cs-usenet@arcor.de: tex-mode: too many _ (underscores)
	interpreted as subscripts]
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:19:10 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CEUcI-0003bS-KF@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1CDv1l-0004xy-QH@fencepost.gnu.org> <cjp02u$236$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096903221 19517 80.91.229.6 (4 Oct 2004 15:20:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:20:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 17:20:17 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CEUdN-0000d1-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 17:20:17 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CEUjx-0008Gm-N2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:27:05 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CEUjl-0008Ef-BQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:26:53 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CEUji-0008DH-HS
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:26:50 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEUji-0008Ca-Fz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:26:50 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CEUcJ-00062w-8v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:19:11 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CEUcI-0003bS-KF; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:19:10 -0400
Original-To: Ralf Angeli <angeli@iwi.uni-sb.de>
In-reply-to: <cjp02u$236$1@sea.gmane.org> (message from Ralf Angeli on Sun, 03
	Oct 2004 15:52:48 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27886
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27886

    If this should be fixed for arbitrary LaTeX commands which are not
    fontified, one would have to check if the underscores in concern are
    located inside of math environments.

\nolinkurl and \url are not related to math.  Is there an intermediate
possibility, one that doesn't check specifically for math
environments, but handles all the constructs that are not related to
math?

Meanwhile, why is texmathp so slow?