From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: C-c C-{l,r} in Enriched mode.
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:18:01 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CEUbB-0003RJ-68@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200409300305.i8U35NF21051@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1CD97n-0001hh-W7@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200410010253.i912rVu08602@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1CE7PY-0002mM-Ug@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200410032103.i93L3ge10444@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096903132 19229 80.91.229.6 (4 Oct 2004 15:18:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:18:52 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 17:18:47 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CEUbv-0000Un-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 17:18:47 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CEUiW-0007ZA-1p
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:25:36 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CEUiE-0007V2-Cq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:25:18 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CEUiC-0007U8-B8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:25:17 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEUiB-0007Tx-Qa
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:25:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CEUbB-0005h2-Hd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:18:01 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CEUbB-0003RJ-68; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:18:01 -0400
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200410032103.i93L3ge10444@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Sun, 3 Oct 2004 16:03:42 -0500 (CDT))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27883
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27883

    Since the reftex binding is only a _suggested_ binding in non-TeX
    buffers, I would, on second thought, presume that this is not really a
    conflict and, hence, that the C-c [ and C-c ] bindings for
    set-{left,right}-margin in Enriched mode are OK.

Would you please make that change?