From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: C-c C-{l,r} in Enriched mode.
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:10:07 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CD97n-0001hh-W7@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200409300305.i8U35NF21051@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096582269 2065 80.91.229.6 (30 Sep 2004 22:11:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:11:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 01 00:10:56 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CD98a-0005lX-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:10:56 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CD9F0-0007oI-2a
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:17:34 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CD9Es-0007mA-Qd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:17:26 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CD9Er-0007lL-Sc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:17:26 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CD9Er-0007lD-Of
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:17:25 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CD97o-000845-Ej
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:10:08 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CD97n-0001hh-W7; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:10:08 -0400
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200409300305.i8U35NF21051@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:05:23 -0500 (CDT))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27766
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27766

    But when used in conjunction with Outline mode, Enriched mode
    overrides Outline mode's C-c C-l (`hide-leaves') binding.

    Should `set-{left,right}-margin' in Enriched mode be rebound?

It sounds like a good argument.  What new bindings do you suggest?

    While on the subject of keybindings, it seems that there are no rules
    for C-c followed by a _Meta_ character.  Are these just too
    inconvenient to worry about?

I think so.