From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jerome.marant@free.fr: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.] Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:59:48 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1096291271.415813c757a26@imp6-q.free.fr> <20040927134714.GA20012@fencepost> <87hdphx91c.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87655wswkv.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096561160 32735 80.91.229.6 (30 Sep 2004 16:19:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, jmarant@free.fr, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 30 18:19:12 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CD3eB-00086m-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:19:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CD3kZ-00030f-Mk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:25:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CD3SN-0006rM-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CD3SM-0006qn-QZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:06:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CD3SM-0006pt-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:06:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CD3LS-0007Q5-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:59:50 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CD3LQ-0004cE-NK; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:59:48 -0400 Original-To: Rob Browning In-reply-to: <87655wswkv.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob Browning on Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:29:20 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27722 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27722 Imagine that 21.4 has been relased, and then imagine Jerome and I have made 21.5, 21.6, and 21.7 bugfix releases using backports or patches that were submitted to Debian, that have been approved by the Emacs developers. Now imagine that you're preparing to make a new release from the "main" upstream development branch. What do you call it? 22.1, I think.