From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [jerome.marant@free.fr: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs
	releases.]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:55:57 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CC4PV-0000Iv-0l@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1CBq57-0000yV-4j@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3hdpk2gom.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<1096285717.4157fe159930b@imp1-q.free.fr>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096325803 12497 80.91.229.6 (27 Sep 2004 22:56:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:56:43 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 28 00:56:28 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CC4Q0-00077o-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:56:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CC4WG-00053m-4M
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:02:56 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CC4W2-00053b-ST
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:02:42 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CC4W1-00053P-Rp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:02:42 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CC4W1-00053M-0H
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:02:41 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CC4PV-0006w8-EQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:55:57 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CC4PV-0000Iv-0l; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:55:57 -0400
Original-To: =?iso-8859-1?b?Suly9G1l?= Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
In-reply-to: <1096285717.4157fe159930b@imp1-q.free.fr> (message from
	=?iso-8859-1?b?Suly9G1l?= Marant on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:48:37 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27633
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27633

    We propose to start this once 21.4 (the current CVS trunk) is
    released. We don't intend to do anything about 21.3 because
    21.4 is approching and it would be counterproductive.

I had misunderstood that point.  Since this is only for
after 21.4, we don't need to make any real decisions now.
If you want to take charge of making bug fix releases
off 21.4, it sounds like a good thing.