From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Successful build of emacs-unicode-2 under Windows with MinGW
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:59:30 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CA7ec-0002qw-1Q@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <u6569moez.fsf@gmail.com> <876568ontp.fsf@darkhell.com>
	<68c73b1a0409202237489fef97@mail.gmail.com>
	<buofz5cgohe.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095861709 13988 80.91.229.6 (22 Sep 2004 14:01:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: chenggao@gmail.com, dhruva.krishnamurthy@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 22 16:01:41 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CA7gj-0006hu-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:01:41 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CA7mh-00084X-1o
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:07:51 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CA7ld-0007IV-Kd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:06:45 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CA7lb-0007Hq-PB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:06:44 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CA7lb-0007Gj-Jl
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:06:43 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CA7ec-0005fJ-NN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:59:30 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CA7ec-0002qw-1Q; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:59:30 -0400
Original-To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <buofz5cgohe.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (message from Miles
	Bader on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:50:05 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27443
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27443

    > How important is it to test the emacs-unicode-2 branch at this
    > juncture?

    Probably not very.  It's more important to test the trunk, as it will be
    released much sooner.

Lots of us are testing the trunk.  I think it is important
to have some people regularly using the emacs-unicode-2 branch,
while most test the trunk.

So if you're regularly using the emacs-unicode-2 branch,
please speak up.