From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: undo in compilation mode
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:26:00 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1BzOCO-00060t-Gs@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1Bz1vr-000345-G6@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<quack.20040822T1843.j5d61i8w8j@hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093303618 17822 80.91.224.253 (23 Aug 2004 23:26:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:26:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 24 01:26:40 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BzOD1-00071P-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:26:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BzOHV-00031f-HE
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:31:17 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BzOH8-0002tc-V2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:30:55 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BzOH7-0002t3-OB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:30:54 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BzOH7-0002st-Is
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:30:53 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzOCO-0004FN-VI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:26:01 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BzOCO-00060t-Gs; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:26:00 -0400
Original-To: quarl+dated+1093657282.52fc76@nospam.quarl.org
In-reply-to: <quack.20040822T1843.j5d61i8w8j@hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu> (message
	from Karl Chen on Sun, 22 Aug 2004 18:43:40 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26431
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26431

    By the way, I think undo support in compilation mode (for text
    output by 'compile' at least) is usually superfluous as well, and
    in fact even a little confusing

If people want to play with trying to turn that off,
we could see what the results are like.
Would it be sufficient just to turn off undo
in those buffers?