From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired"
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:50:06 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1ByZ4A-0006yr-Iy@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20040821.040855.00470268.jet@gyve.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093107103 24404 80.91.224.253 (21 Aug 2004 16:51:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:51:43 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 21 18:51:39 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ByZ5f-0003ik-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:51:39 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1ByZA1-0004qL-Mc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:56:09 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1ByZ93-0004Jy-IF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:55:09 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1ByZ92-0004J5-6J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:55:08 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ByZ92-0004IT-0z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:55:08 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ByZ4A-0007JP-W5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:50:07 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ByZ4A-0006yr-Iy; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:50:06 -0400
Original-To: Masatake YAMATO <jet@gyve.org>
In-reply-to: <20040821.040855.00470268.jet@gyve.org> (message from Masatake
	YAMATO on Sat, 21 Aug 2004 04:08:55 +0900 (JST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26374
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26374

    ?.uu is surrounded by whitespace. So above command line generated an
    unexpected file.

The change that makes ? operate this way only when followed by whitespace
made the example incorrect.  As far as I can see, there is no simple way
to make this example work again:

          uuencode ? ? > ?.uu

Does anyone see a way that I don't see?
If not, I will just delete the example.

It is sort of unfortunate if there's no way now to
substitute the file name and add an extension to it.