From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: window-list
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:49:52 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1By1Lc-000390-T0@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <quack.20040817T1025.j5hdr1k77j@hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu>
	<m34qn0d91s.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<200408181803.i7II3eo23397@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<m3vfffjw32.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092977465 19803 80.91.224.253 (20 Aug 2004 04:51:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: quarl+dated+1093194046.34955e@nospam.quarl.org, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 06:51:00 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1By1Mi-0003HT-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:51:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1By1Qz-00016s-1A
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:55:25 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1By1QH-0000ud-DS
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:54:41 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1By1QF-0000tp-Sv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:54:40 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1By1QF-0000tm-Qy
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:54:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1By1Lf-0002ow-3r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:49:55 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1By1Lc-000390-T0; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:49:53 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3vfffjw32.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26338
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26338

    > (window-list frame minibuf (frame-first-window frame))

    Would it be an idea to mention that in the manual?

I don't think we need to clutter the manual by documenting erroneous
behavior that has been fixed.  The behavior of the function now agrees
with its documentation, so if anyone sees an incorrect use of it, he
will know how to fix it.