From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rebinding international characters Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:34:15 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <658l7dju.fsf@wanadoo.es> <200407270250.LAA07100@etlken.m17n.org> <200407280152.KAA09883@etlken.m17n.org> <200407300642.PAA15666@etlken.m17n.org> <200408021244.VAA22947@etlken.m17n.org> <200408030020.JAA24083@etlken.m17n.org> <200408031209.VAA25650@etlken.m17n.org> <2914-Tue03Aug2004220812+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <200408050046.JAA29472@etlken.m17n.org> <3c32jrng.fsf@wanadoo.es> <200408050447.NAA29917@etlken.m17n.org> <200408170714.QAA2 Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092792926 25449 80.91.224.253 (18 Aug 2004 01:35:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 18 03:35:17 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BxFMD-0006mb-00 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 03:35:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BxFQO-0004dX-PM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:39:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BxFPo-0004QB-Ce for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:39:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BxFPm-0004PC-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BxFPm-0004Oe-5A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxFLE-0007ig-8z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BxFLD-0003Qe-Te; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:34:16 -0400 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: <200408170714.QAA29316@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi Handa on Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:14:13 +0900 (JST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26294 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26294 I think (C-1), (F-1), (F-2), (G-2), (H-1), (H-2) are not good. (C-1) should be 2289, (F-1) (H-1) should be 241, (F-2) (G-2) (H-2) should be [241]. I don't agree. These should not be changed. Unibyte and multibyte are representations for text in buffers--that is all. They should not affect how input keys are represented. It is correct that we get the same results from read-event and read-key-sequence regardless of which representation the buffer uses.