From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Gnus branch
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:58:31 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1BvlwN-0003Hn-Ey@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <jwvwu04gc6f.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<x5y8kj3nn4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092441540 21869 80.91.224.253 (13 Aug 2004 23:59:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 23:59:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 14 01:58:54 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Bvlwj-00045i-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:58:54 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Bvm0i-00065t-Is
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:03:00 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Bvm0X-00064O-CJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:02:49 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Bvm0W-00063t-8u
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:02:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bvm0W-00063j-6O
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:02:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BvlwN-0000HT-Uh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:58:31 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BvlwN-0003Hn-Ey; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:58:31 -0400
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <x5y8kj3nn4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on 13
	Aug 2004 02:08:47 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26266
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26266

    The idea was not to lose changes that occured in the trunk, right?

Yes.  The useful changes in the trunk were going to be merged into the
branch.

When that is done, we want to move the new Gnus into trunk.  Is it
done?