From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: puzzle.el.
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:44:54 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1Bmd8A-0007E2-2M@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87llhizw3g.fsf@dugong.chemistry.nottingham.ac.uk>
	<m3u0w42wh7.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1090264096 32173 80.91.224.253 (19 Jul 2004 19:08:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:08:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: matt@stchem.bham.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 19 21:08:01 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Bmd9K-0003Au-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:46:06 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BmdC1-0007eW-88
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:48:53 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BmdBd-0007WV-UA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:48:30 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BmdBd-0007W6-2W
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:48:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BmdBc-0007Vp-VK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:48:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bmd8B-0002Ry-Ji
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:44:55 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bmd8A-0007E2-2M; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:44:54 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3u0w42wh7.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25851
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25851

    For example, if the smallest font is 10x10 and your window is 600x800, you will get a glyph matrix of approx 60x80.
    Now, if you use a sliced image (or just many images which are less than 10x10 in size, you can easily fill the
    window with more than those 60x80 glyphs.

Maybe redisplay should notice when it encounters a glyph below
the size that was used for the calculation of the glyph matrix,
and enlarge the glyph matrix at that point.